A client who is a teacher at a middle school shared with me that during some faculty meetings, there was a heated discussion about how to address the fact that a large number of students report experiencing “childhood trauma.” The debate among the faculty members reflects a broader concern about distinguishing between genuine trauma and common childhood difficulties, which can often be misinterpreted as trauma.
No childhood is perfect, and no parent is flawless. Moreover, some children are more sensitive than others, and family dynamics may place certain children in challenging situations for various reasons unrelated to abuse or neglect. For instance, while every parent may deny having a favorite child, each son or daughter often feels like the favored one or perceives that a sibling is preferred; many marriages end up divorcing without presenting threat to the kids; etc. Parents, despite their best efforts, inevitably do or say things that inadvertently hurt their children. However, these challenges alone do not necessarily equate to “childhood trauma.”
When using the term “childhood trauma” (CHT), one should consider not only a broad spectrum of adverse experiences that occur during childhood but primarily those that cause profound disruption to the child’s neurobiological, psychological, and social functioning. These experiences typically involve situations with primary caregivers that are perceived as threatening and defeating by the child. They may range from isolated events such as a car crash that left a parent unavailable for a while, to chronic stressors like physical or emotional abuse, or a general lack of safety that persists throughout childhood. It’s crucial to remember that exposure to traumatic experiences alone does not constitute trauma unless there are lasting consequences. Now, let’s clarify some of the myths about childhood trauma that are widely circulated.
Myth: Children always “bounce back” from trauma. While it is true that children can demonstrate remarkable resilience, it’s not warranted that they will naturally recover from traumatic experiences. The brain’s ability to adapt and reorganize itself in response to new experiences and environmental influences is especially pronounced in children, potentially enabling them to recover from traumatic events more readily than adults. Still, the effects of extreme stress can have a lasting impact on the child’s development, or manifest later in life, particularly when current stressors become intolerable due to unresolved issues from childhood.
The gradual adaptations that the child’s system undergoes to cope with threatening circumstances slowly erode resilience. This impact may not become evident until years later, when symptoms emerge or some level of dysfunction is experienced.
Source: Marta Wave / Pexels
Myth: Children do not have the option to respond with fight-flight, therefore they dissociate automatically. Some authors have popularized the idea that extreme stress in children always results in terror and an inability to fight back or escape. While such situations do exist, they do not encompass all children. Some children, even in high-risk environments, may find other ways to cope with threats. For example, children living with a physically abusive parent might choose to engage in sports with friends during conflicts or confront the parent to defend themselves or others. This variability in response contributes to diagnoses like Oppositional Defiant Disorder. Additionally, many young children rely more on external regulation and support from those around them rather than resorting to fighting, fleeing, or shutting down. Children’s responses to stress are influenced by their developmental stage and the support systems available to them. Their prefrontal cortex (PFC) is not fully developed, and they may not fully recognize or understand the dangers in their environment.
Myth: Childhood trauma only consists of extreme abuse or neglect. While abuse and neglect are indeed traumatic experiences that can profoundly affect children, other adverse experiences can also have lasting psychological, emotional, and physical effects. These include witnessing domestic violence, experiencing bullying, losing a caregiver or sibling, dealing with a stressful or threatening environment due to sudden or chronic physical or mental illness within the family, or living in a chaotic environment. Additionally, abuse and neglect have different consequences, and neglect is not always traumatizing.
Myth: All children exposed to trauma will develop PTSD or C-PTSD. There is a generalized belief that all children exposed to traumatic events have or will develop PTSD or C-PTSD. However, trauma is highly subjective, and no universal generalization can be made. Not all individuals who experience traumatic circumstances during childhood will develop a disorder, because each child perceives threat differently and has unique ways to resource themselves in managing stress. Factors influencing whether a child may develop PTSD or C-PTSD include the nature, severity, and length of the traumatic event, the child’s support system, and their natural temperament.
Myth: Childhood trauma is always evident and easily identifiable. Since children are still developing their personalities, their behaviors are often assumed to be part of their natural temperament. This can make it difficult for parents, caregivers, and educators to differentiate between typical developmental behaviors and those that may signal underlying traumatization, such as changes in sleeping or eating habits, difficulties with concentration, or regression in developmental milestones. Signs such as withdrawal from social interactions, aggressive behaviors, or emotional outbursts may be easily attributed to “acting out” or “being difficult” child.
Myth: Childhood trauma only affects the individual during childhood. Some people mistakenly believe that the effects of childhood trauma are limited to an individual’s formative years and will diminish as they grow older. However, depending on factors such as severity and duration of the traumatic circumstances, age at which the traumatization occurred, internal and external resources, and the type of traumatic events experienced, CHT can have lasting impacts that extend far beyond childhood. These long-term effects may include an increased risk of anxiety, depression, post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), or substance abuse. Additionally, childhood trauma has been linked to a higher incidence of physical health issues later in life.
Furthermore, individuals with a history of childhood trauma may face challenges in forming and maintaining relationships, as difficulties with trust, attachment, and communication can become more pronounced during adulthood.
